The Book
TOCIntro  
Chapters:
123456789101112
 13  14151617181920
 2122232425
A1A2A3  A4A5A6BibKarl

Vibrant Life Web

Family Of Three Chelation Formulas
Other VL Products
The Wednesday Letter
Frequently Asked Questions
Testimonials

Life Flow One, The Solution For Heart Disease Data Section

Shopping Cart

Use Separate Search Page or

Separate Search Page
or search below


Navigation Help

 

Ingredients
Technical
Write To Karl Loren Table Of Contents

Aspirin Data
Life Flow One
The Solution For Heart Disease

by
Karl Loren


Results for your query on June 13, 1999:
Search all fields for: death
Words in title only: aspirin
Published in 1997 through 1999
Only select references with abstracts available
Show references published in English only
Documents: 1 to 30 of 30
Top
1 Rotchell YE, et al; Barbados Low Dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy (BLASP): a randomised trial for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications. (Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1998 Mar, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
2 Palatnick W, et al; Aspirin poisoning during pregnancy: increased fetal sensitivity. (Am J Perinatol, 1998 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
3 Nguyen KN, et al; Interaction between enalapril and aspirin on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: subgroup analysis of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II) [see comments] (Am J Cardiol, 1997 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
4 De Keyser J, et al; Early outcome in acute ischemic stroke is not influenced by the prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin. (J Neurol Sci, 1997 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
5 A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators [see comments] (N Engl J Med, 1998 May, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
6 The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group [see comments] (Lancet, 1997 May, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
7 Forbes CD; Secondary stroke prevention with low-dose aspirin, sustained release dipyridamole alone and in combination. ESPS Investigators. European Stroke Prevention Study. (Thromb Res, 1998 Sep, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
8 Pregnancy-related death associated with heparin and aspirin treatment for infertility, 1996. (MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 1998 May, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
9 CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) Collaborative Group [see comments] (Lancet, 1997 Jun, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
10 Ennamany R, et al; Aspirin and heparin prevent hepatic blood stasis and thrombosis induced by the toxic glycoprotein Bolesatine in mice. (Hum Exp Toxicol, 1998 Nov, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]

Menu Position #10

11 Gull‡v AL, et al; Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone and in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study [see comments] (Arch Intern Med, 1998 Jul, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
12 Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group. (Stroke, 1998 Jul, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
13 Baigent C, et al; ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. (BMJ, 1998 May, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
14 Borzak S, et al; Effects of prior aspirin and anti-ischemic therapy on outcome of patients with unstable angina. TIMI 7 Investigators. Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischemia. (Am J Cardiol, 1998 Mar, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
15 Thrombosis prevention trial: randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. The Medical Research Council's General Practice Research Framework [see comments] (Lancet, 1998 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
16 Randomised double-blind trial of fixed low-dose warfarin with aspirin after myocardial infarction. Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS) Investigators [see comments] (Lancet, 1997 Aug, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
17 Ishikawa K, et al; Aspirin plus either dipyridamole or ticlopidine is effective in preventing recurrent myocardial infarction. Secondary Prevention Group. (Jpn Circ J, 1997 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
18 McCormick D, et al; Use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering medications before recurrent acute myocardial infarction: missed opportunities for prevention? (Arch Intern Med, 1999 Mar, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
19 Creager MA; Results of the CAPRIE trial: efficacy and safety of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events. (Vasc Med, 1998, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
20 Bing M, et al; Aspirin administration for cardiac-related acute chest pain/angina: increased use in Medicare patients. (South Med J, 1999 Jan, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]

Menu Position #20

21 Augustovski FA, et al; Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events. (J Gen Intern Med, 1998 Dec, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
22 Patrono C; Prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke by aspirin: different mechanisms? Different dosage? (Thromb Res, 1998 Sep, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
23 Urban P, et al; Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the multicenter aspirin and ticlopidine trial after intracoronary stenting (MATTIS). (Circulation, 1998 Nov, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
24 Bertrand ME, et al; Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study. (Circulation, 1998 Oct, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
25 Bertrand ME, et al; Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study. (Circulation, 1998 Oct, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
26 Subbegowda R, et al; Aspirin toxicity for human colonic tumor cells results from necrosis and is accompanied by cell cycle arrest. (Cancer Res, 1998 Jul, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
27 Caritis S, et al; Low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units [see comments] (N Engl J Med, 1998 Mar, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
28 A randomized trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin. The Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) Study Group. (Ann Neurol, 1997 Dec, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
29 Kunishima T, et al; A randomized trial of aspirin versus cilostazol therapy after successful coronary stent implantation. (Clin Ther, 1997 Sep, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]
30 White HD, et al; Randomized, double-blind comparison of hirulog versus heparin in patients receiving streptokinase and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (HERO). Hirulog Early Reperfusion/Occlusion (HERO) Trial Investigators [see comments] (Circulation, 1997 Oct, Abstract available) [MEDLINE]

Menu Position #30

 

Return To Top

NLM database Documents


Record 1 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
Barbados Low Dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy (BLASP): a randomised trial for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications.
Author
Rotchell YE; Cruickshank JK; Gay MP; Griffiths J; Stewart A; Farrell B; Ayers S; Hennis A; Grant A; Duley L; Collins R
Address
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Barbados.
Source
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1998 Mar, 105:3, 286-92
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic, low dose controlled-release aspirin improves outcome for pregnant women and their babies in Barbados. DESIGN: Randomised placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Barbados. POPULATION: All women attending antenatal clinics between 12 and 32 weeks of gestation were eligible, if without specific contraindications to aspirin and unlikely to deliver immediately. METHODS: Randomisation was computer-generated in the antenatal clinic; 1822 women were allocated to receive 75 mg controlled-release aspirin and 1825 matching placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proteinuric pre-eclampsia, other pregnancy-induced hypertension, pregnancy duration, birthweight, stillbirths and neonatal deaths, major neonatal events. RESULTS: All but three women from each group were followed up successfully. Forty-four percent were primigravid, and 8% had previous obstetric complications. There were no significant differences between the allocated treatment groups in the incidence of proteinuric pre-eclampsia (40 [2.2%] of those allocated aspirin, compared with 46 [2.5%] allocated placebo), of preterm delivery (255 [14.0%] vs 270 [14.8%]), of birthweight < 1500 g (32 [1.7%] vs 33 [1.8%]) or of stillbirth and neonatal death (44 [2.4%] vs 38 [2.1%]). Aspirin was not associated with excess risk of maternal or fetal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study in Barbados do not support the routine use of low dose aspirin for prevention of pre-eclampsia or its complications, confirming results of previous large trials in other settings.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98194182

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*AD; Pre-Eclampsia|*PC
MeSH Heading
Adult; Barbados|EP; Birth Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Fetal Death; Gestational Age; Hospitalization; Human; Infant; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Prenatal Care; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Time Factors

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0306-5456
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 2 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
Aspirin poisoning during pregnancy: increased fetal sensitivity.
Author
Palatnick W; Tenenbein M
Address
Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba and Children's Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada.
Source
Am J Perinatol, 1998 Jan, 15:1, 39-41
Abstract
Descriptions of salicylate poisoning during pregnancy are rare and unique features of perinatal physiology predict an increased sensitivity of the fetus to aspirin poisoning. A 17-year-old, 37-week pregnant woman presented to the hospital stating that she had ingested 50 aspirin tablets per day for 1 month in an attempt to harm her baby and herself. Ultrasound showed fetal demise. Serum salicylate was 620 mg/L with an anion gap of 22.6 and the following blood gases: pO2 108 mm Hg, pCO2 15mm Hg, pH 7.34, and HCO3 8.8 mmol/L. She was successfully treated with alkaline diuresis followed by hemodialysis. She spontaneously delivered a macerated stillborn 2380-g fetus. Autopsy revealed diffuse petechiae in the lungs, heart, thymus, and kidneys. Salicylic acid was found in the cord blood, but quantification was not possible due to the small volume of the blood sample. Our patient supports the hypothesis that the fetus is at greater risk than the mother in salicylate poisoning during pregnancy. Consideration should be given to emergent delivery of term or near-term, aspirin-poisoned fetuses.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98133833

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal|BL/*PO; Aspirin|BL/*PO; Fetal Death|*CI; Fetus|*DE
MeSH Heading
Adolescence; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Glucose|AN; Case Report; Diuresis; Female; Fetal Blood|CH; Hemodialysis; Human; Male; Pregnancy; Vitamin K|TU

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0735-1631
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 3 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
Interaction between enalapril and aspirin on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: subgroup analysis of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II) [see comments]
Author
Nguyen KN; Aursnes I; Kjekshus J
Address
Department of Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Oslo, Norway.
Source
Am J Cardiol, 1997 Jan, 79:2, 115-9
Abstract
The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors early after an acute myocardial infarction to reduce mortality has been studied in several trials with inconsistent results. Aspirin (ASA) has become a well-documented therapeutic adjunct in patients with coronary heart disease. Attention has recently been focused on a possible interaction between ASA and ACE inhibitors. We therefore reanalyzed data from the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II) to find any evidence of differential effects of the ACE inhibitor enalapril in subgroups defined by use of ASA at baseline. Logistic regression tested the multiplicative interaction. We used Rothman synergy index S, which would be equal to unity under additivity, and less than unity when suggesting antagonism, to examine the postulated interaction with departure from an additive model. Logistic regression showed that the enalapril-ASA interaction term was a significant predictor of mortality at the end of the study (p = 0.047), and was a borderline significant predictor of mortality 30 days after randomization (p = 0.085). The Rothman synergy index S was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.94) for mortality at the end of the study, and 0.68 ( 0.44 to 1.04) for 30-day mortality, indicating antagonism between enalapril and ASA with departure from an additive model. Thus, we found evidence of enalapril-ASA interaction. The effect of enalapril was less favorable among patients taking ASA than among patients not taking ASA at baseline.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97336213

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors|AD/*TU; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal|AD/AI/*TU; Aspirin|AD/AI/*TU; Enalapril|AD/AI/*TU; Myocardial Infarction|*DT
MeSH Heading
Aged; Cause of Death; Confidence Intervals; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; Heart Failure, Congestive|PP; Human; Logistic Models; Male; Placebos; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Scandinavia; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0002-9149
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 4 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
Early outcome in acute ischemic stroke is not influenced by the prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin.
Author
De Keyser J; Herroelen L; De Klippel N
Address
Department of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, The Netherlands. j.h.a.de.keyser@med.rug.nl
Source
J Neurol Sci, 1997 Jan, 145:1, 93-6
Abstract
Aspirin reduces the occurrence of ischemic strokes. In some prophylactic trials it was suggested that aspirin might also lessen stroke severity, and hence improve outcome in patients sustaining an ischemic stroke. We examined stroke severity (by using the Mathew scale) and early outcome (Barthel index and mortality on day 21) in 91 patients with an acute (< 24 h) ischemic stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Twenty-seven patients were taking low-dose aspirin (100 or 200 mg/day) prior to their stroke, and 64 were not using antiplatelet drugs. There were no significant differences in baseline stroke severity, early (21 days) mortality or early disability between the two groups. The results of this small study suggest that the use of low-dose aspirin prior to an ischemic stroke does not influence the severity of that stroke and early outcome.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97225765

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Cerebral Ischemia|CO/*DT/MO; Cerebrovascular Disorders|*DT/ET/*PC
MeSH Heading
Aged; Cause of Death; Cerebral Hemorrhage|MO/RA; Comparative Study; Female; Human; Male; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0022-510X
Country of Publication
NETHERLANDS


Record 5 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators [see comments]
Address
Source
N Engl J Med, 1998 May, 338:21, 1498-505
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Activation of platelets is central to the pathophysiology of unstable angina. We studied whether inhibition of the final common pathway for platelet aggregation with tirofiban, a nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, would improve clinical outcome in this condition. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 3232 patients who were already receiving aspirin to additional treatment with intravenous tirofiban for 48 hours. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 48 hours. RESULTS: The incidence of the composite end point was 32 percent lower at 48 hours in the group that received tirofiban (3.8 percent, vs. 5.6 percent with heparin; risk ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.92; P=0.01). Percutaneous revascularization was performed in 1.9 percent of the patients during the first 48 hours. At 30 days, the frequency of the composite end point (with the addition of readmission for unstable angina) was similar in the two groups (15.9 percent in the tirofiban group vs. 17.1 percent in the heparin group, P=0.34). There was a trend toward a reduction in the rate of death or myocardial infarction with tirofiban (a rate of 5.8 percent, as compared with 7.1 percent in the heparin group; risk ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 1.05; P=0.11), and mortality was 2.3 percent, as compared with 3.6 percent in the heparin group (P=0.02). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4 percent of the patients in both groups. Reversible thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with tirofiban than with heparin (1.1 percent vs. 0.4 percent, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban was generally well tolerated and, as compared with heparin, reduced ischemic events during the 48-hour infusion period, during which revascularization procedures were not performed. The incidence of refractory ischemia and myocardial infarction was not reduced at 30 days, but mortality was lower among the patients given tirofiban. Platelet inhibition with aspirin plus tirofiban may have a role in the management of unstable angina.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98242979

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Angina, Unstable|*DT/MO; Aspirin|*TU; Fibrinolytic Agents|*TU; Heparin|*TU; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex|*AI; Tyrosine|*AA/TU
MeSH Heading
Aged; Comparative Study; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Human; Incidence; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Age; Myocardial Infarction|EP/PC; Myocardial Ischemia|EP/PC; Proportional Hazards Models

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0028-4793
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 6 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group [see comments]
Address
Source
Lancet, 1997 May, 349:9065, 1569-81
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only a few small trials have compared antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents) versus control in acute ischaemic stroke, and none has been large enough to provide reliable evidence on safety or efficacy. METHODS: The International Stroke Trial (IST) was a large, randomised, open trial of up to 14 days of antithrombotic therapy started as soon as possible after stroke onset. The aim was to provide reliable evidence on the safety and efficacy of aspirin and of subcutaneous heparin. Half the patients were allocated unfractionated heparin (5000 or 12,500 IU bd [twice daily]), and half were allocated "avoid heparin"; and, in a factorial design, half were allocated aspirin 300 mg daily and half "avoid aspirin". The primary outcomes were death within 14 days and death or dependency at 6 months. 19,435 patients with suspected acute ischaemic stroke entering 467 hospitals in 36 countries were randomised within 48 hours of symptom onset. RESULTS: Among heparin-allocated patients, there were non-significantly fewer deaths within 14 days (876 [9.0%] heparin vs 905 [9.3%] no heparin), corresponding to 3 (SD 4) fewer deaths per 1000 patients. At 6 months the percentage dead or dependent was identical in both groups (62.9%). Patients allocated to heparin had significantly fewer recurrent ischaemic strokes within 14 days (2.9% vs 3.8%) but this was offset by a similar-sized increase in haemorrhagic strokes (1.2% vs 0.4%), so the difference in death or non-fatal recurrent stroke (11.7% vs 12.0%) was not significant. Heparin was associated with a significant excess of 9 (SD 1) transfused or fatal extracranial bleeds per 1000. Compared with 5000 IU bd heparin, 12,500 IU bd heparin was associated with significantly more transfused or fatal extracranial bleeds, more haemorrhagic strokes, and more deaths or non-fatal strokes within 14 days (12.6% vs 10.8%). Among aspirin-allocated patients there were non-significantly fewer deaths within 14 days (872 [9.0%] vs 909 [9.4%]), corresponding to 4 (SD 4) fewer deaths per 1000 patients. At 6 months there was a non-significant trend towards a smaller percentage of the aspirin group being dead or dependent (62.2% vs 63.5%, 2p = 0.07), a difference of 13 (SD 7) per 1000; after adjustment for baseline prognosis the benefit from aspirin was significant (14 [SD 6] per 1000, 2p = 0.03). Aspirin-allocated patients had significantly fewer recurrent ischaemic strokes within 14 days (2.8% vs 3.9%) with no significant excess of haemorrhagic strokes (0.9% vs 0.8%), so the reduction in death or non-fatal recurrent stroke with aspirin (11.3% vs 12.4%) was significant. Aspirin was associated with a significant excess of 5 (SD 1) transfused or fatal extracranial bleeds per 1000; in the absence of heparin the excess was 2 (SD 1) and was not significant. There was no interaction between aspirin and heparin in the main outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Neither heparin regimen offered any clinical advantage at 6 months. The results suggest that if heparin is given in routine clinical practice, the dose should not exceed 5000 IU subcutaneously twice daily. For aspirin, the IST suggests a small but worthwhile improvement at 6 months. Taking the IST together with the comparably large Chinese Acute Stroke Trial, aspirin produces a small but real reduction of about 10 deaths or recurrent strokes per 1000 during the first few weeks. Both trials suggest that aspirin should be started as soon as possible after the onset of ischaemic stroke; previous trials have already shown that continuation of low-dose aspirin gives protection in the longer term.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97317545

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|AD/*TU; Aspirin|AD/*TU; Cerebrovascular Disorders|*DT/MO; Heparin|AD/*TU; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AD/*TU
MeSH Heading
Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Protocols; Comparative Study; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human; Infusions, Parenteral; Male; Middle Age; Recurrence; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0140-6736
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 7 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top

Title
Secondary stroke prevention with low-dose aspirin, sustained release dipyridamole alone and in combination. ESPS Investigators. European Stroke Prevention Study.
Author
Forbes CD
Address
University of Dundee Medical School, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Source
Thromb Res, 1998 Sep, 92:1 Suppl 1, S1-6
Abstract
Patients who had survived a stroke or transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) were admitted to a trial of low-dose aspirin (50 mg) alone, sustained release dipyridamole (400 mg/day) alone, or a combination of the two agents, and results compared with a placebo over 24 months. This low-dose aspirin regimen produced in pairwise comparisons a significant risk reduction of 18% for stroke, 13% for stroke and/or death but no reduction in all cause mortality. The sustained release dipyridamole produced a significant risk reduction of 16% for stroke, 15% for stroke and/or death but no significant reduction of mortality. In combination, aspirin and dipyridamole produced a risk reduction of 37% in stroke, 24% in stroke and/or death, and no reduction in mortality. Similar findings were found in TIA, which was a secondary endpoint. These results are highly significant in comparison with placebo. As expected, there were enhanced reports of alimentary side-effects in the aspirin groups and also enhanced bleeding. Dipyridamole was associated with a slight increase in headache, which resolved in most patients if therapy was continued. The conclusions are that 50 mg/day of aspirin alone or 400 mg/day of sustained release dipyridamole alone are equally effective in stroke and TIA prevention. When used in combination the effects were additive and were significantly more effective than the single agents.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98453090

Return To Top


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD/AE; Cerebrovascular Disorders|DT/*PC; Dipyridamole|*AD/AE; Fibrinolytic Agents|*AD/AE; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*AD/AE
MeSH Heading
Aged; Cerebral Ischemia, Transient|DT; Comparative Study; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Synergism; Female; Headache|CI; Hemorrhage|CI; Human; Male; Middle Age; Recurrence

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0049-3848
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 8 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Pregnancy-related death associated with heparin and aspirin treatment for infertility, 1996.
Address
Source
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 1998 May, 47:18, 368-71
Abstract
In 1996, a 38-year-old nulliparous woman died from complications of a cerebral hemorrhage. She was approximately 9 weeks' pregnant with triplets at the time of her death. The patient had undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) and was being treated with anticoagulants (heparin and aspirin) and intravenous immunoglobulin at the time of her death. This report summarizes the investigation of this case by state and county health departments with assistance from CDC.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98264791

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|*AE; Aspirin|*AE; Cerebral Hemorrhage|*ET/PP; Fertilization in Vitro|*; Heparin|*AE; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous|*; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*AE; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic|*ET/PP
MeSH Heading
Adult; Case Report; Fatal Outcome; Female; Human; Immunotherapy|AE; Pregnancy; Triplets

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0149-2195
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 9 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) Collaborative Group [see comments]
Address
Source
Lancet, 1997 Jun, 349:9066, 1641-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspirin is effective in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and in the long-term prevention of serious vascular events in survivors of stroke and myocardial infarction. There is, however, no reliable evidence on the effectiveness of early aspirin use in acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: The Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CAST) was a large randomised, placebo-controlled trial of the effects in hospital of aspirin treatment (160 mg/day) started within 48 h of the onset of suspected acute ischaemic stroke and continued in hospital for up to 4 weeks. The primary endpoints were death from any cause during the 4-week treatment period and death or dependence at discharge, and the analyses were by intention to treat. 21,106 patients with acute ischaemic stroke were enrolled in 413 Chinese hospitals at a mean of 25 h after the onset of symptoms (10,554 aspirin, 10,552 placebo). 87% had a CT scan before randomisation. It was prospectively planned that the results would be analysed in parallel with those of the concurrent. International Stroke Trial (IST) of 20,000 patients with acute stroke from other countries. FINDINGS: There was a significant 14% (SD 7) proportional reduction in mortality during the scheduled treatment period (343 [3.3%] deaths among aspirin-allocated patients vs 398 [3.9%] deaths among placebo-allocated patients; 2p = 0.04). There were significantly fewer recurrent ischaemic strokes in the aspirin-allocated than in the placebo-allocated group (167 [1.6%] vs 215 [2.1%]; 2p = 0.01) but slightly more haemorrhagic strokes (115 [1.1%] vs 93 [0.9%]; 2p > 0.1). For the combined in-hospital endpoint of death or non-fatal stroke at 4 weeks, there was a 12% (6) proportional risk reduction with aspirin (545 [5.3%] vs 614 [5.9%]; 2p = 0.03), an absolute difference of 6.8 (3.2) fewer cases per 1000. At discharge, 3153 (30.5%) aspirin-allocated patients and 3266 (31.6%) placebo-allocated patients were dead or dependent, corresponding to 11.4 (6.4) fewer per 1000 in favour of aspirin (2p = 0.08). INTERPRETATION: There are two major trials of aspirin in acute ischaemic stroke. Taken together, CAST and the similarly large IST show reliably that aspirin started early in hospital produces a small but definite net benefit, with about 9 (SD 3) fewer deaths or non-fatal strokes per 1000 in the first few weeks (2p = 0.001), and with 13 (5) fewer dead or dependent per 1000 after some weeks or months of follow-up (2p < 0.01).
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97329922

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal|AD/AE/*TU; Aspirin|AD/AE/*TU; Cerebrovascular Disorders|*DT/MO/PP; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AD/AE/*TU
MeSH Heading
Acute Disease; Aged; Blood Pressure; China; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Human; Male; Middle Age; Placebos; Recurrence; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0140-6736
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 10 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Aspirin and heparin prevent hepatic blood stasis and thrombosis induced by the toxic glycoprotein Bolesatine in mice.
Author
Ennamany R; Bingen A; Creppy EE; Kretz O; Gut JP; Dubuisson L; Balabaud C; Bioulac Sage P; Kirn A
Address
UniversitÆe de Bordeaux II, UnitÆe de Formation et de Recherche des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, France.
Source
Hum Exp Toxicol, 1998 Nov, 17:11, 620-4
Abstract
Bolesatine is a toxic glycoprotein isolated from Boletus satanas Lenz, which inhibits protein synthesis in vivo and in vitro. The LD50 (24 h) is 1 mg /kg bw (i.p.), in mice and rats. When given i.p. to mice (0.1 - 1.0 mg/kg bw) bolesatine induced thrombi and blood stasis in the liver, 5 - 21 h after injection, and modifications of the number of blood corpuscles in peripheral blood. These effects were efficiently reversed by aspirin, ticlopidin and heparin (as attested by histology and electron microscopy) which however failed to prevent death in animals given lethal doses. Together, these results showed that the death of bolesatine poisoned animals given high doses, was rather due to a combination of thrombosis and other toxic effects. In addition, they suggest that these antithrombotic drugs may overcome cases of human poisoning, with low exposures of this boletus, showing a hypertension probably due to mechanical obstruction which resists normal therapy.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99081017

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*PD; Fungal Proteins|*TO; Hemostasis|*DE; Heparin|*PD; Liver Diseases|BL/CI/*PC; Protein Synthesis Inhibitors|*TO; Thrombosis|*PC
MeSH Heading
Agglutination|DE; Animal; Blood Platelets|DE; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Erythrocytes|DE; Female; Male; Mice; Microscopy, Electron; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Ticlopidine|PD; Time Factors

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0960-3271
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 11 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone and in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study [see comments]
Author
Gull‡v AL; Koefoed BG; Petersen P; Pedersen TS; Andersen ED; Godtfredsen J; Boysen G
Address
Copenhagen General Practitioners Laboratory, Denmark. gullov@dadlnet.dk
Source
Arch Intern Med, 1998 Jul, 158:14, 1513-21
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of warfarin sodium therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, many physicians hesitate to prescribe it to elderly patients because of the risk for bleeding complications and because of inconvenience for the patients. METHODS: The Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study was a randomized, controlled trial examining the following therapies: warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d; warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d, plus aspirin, 300 mg/d; and aspirin, 300 mg/d. These were compared with adjusted-dose warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time [INR], 2.0-3.0). Stroke or a systemic thromboembolic event was the primary outcome event. Transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, and death were secondary events. Data were handled as survival data, and risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model. The trial was scheduled for 6 years from May 1, 1993, but due to scientific evidence of inefficiency of low-intensity warfarin plus aspirin therapy from another study, our trial was prematurely terminated on October 2, 1996. RESULTS: We included 677 patients (median age, 74 years). The cumulative primary event rate after 1 year was 5.8% in patients receiving minidose warfarin; 7.2%, warfarin plus aspirin; 3.6%, aspirin; and 2.8%, adjusted-dose warfarin (P = .67). After 3 years, no difference among the groups was seen. Major bleeding events were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference was insignificant, adjusted-dose warfarin seemed superior to minidose warfarin and to warfarin plus aspirin after 1 year of treatment. The results do not justify a change in the current recommendation of adjusted-dose warfarin (INR, 2.0-3.0) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98343386

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|*AD/AE; Aspirin|*AD/AE; Atrial Fibrillation|CO/*DT; Cerebrovascular Disorders|ET/*PC; Warfarin|*AD/AE
MeSH Heading
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Denmark; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage|CI; Human; Male; Middle Age; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0003-9926
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 12 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group.
Address
Source
Stroke, 1998 Jul, 29:7, 1389-92
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are limited data on the prognosis of patients with angiographically proved symptomatic stenosis of the intracranial vertebral artery or basilar artery. METHODS: We studied 68 patients with 50% to 99% stenosis of one of the following arteries: intracranial vertebral (n = 31), basilar (n = 28), posterior cerebral (PCA) (n = 6), or posterior inferior cerebellar (PICA) (n = 3). All patients had previous transient ischemic attack or stroke in the territory of the stenotic artery and were treated with warfarin (n = 42) or aspirin (n = 26). Follow-up was by chart review and personal or telephone interview. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 13.8 months, 15 patients (22%) had an ischemic stroke (4 fatal), 3 patients (4.5%) had a fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or sudden death, and 6 patients (9%) had a nonfatal MI. Stroke rates in any vascular territory (per 100 patient-years of follow-up) were 15.0 in patients with basilar artery stenosis, 13.7 in patients with vertebral artery stenosis, and 6.0 in patients with PCA or PICA stenosis. Stroke rates in the same territory as the stenotic artery (per 100 patient-years of follow-up) were 10.7 in patients with basilar artery stenosis, 7.8 in patients with vertebral artery stenosis, and 6.0 in patients with PCA or PICA stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery or basilar stenosis are at high risk of stroke, MI, or sudden death. Further studies are needed to clarify optimal therapy for these patients.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98321829

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Basilar Artery|*; Cerebrovascular Disorders|PC/*PP; Vertebral Artery|*
MeSH Heading
Aged; Anticoagulants|TU; Aspirin|TU; Cerebellum|BS; Cerebral Arteries; Cerebral Ischemia|PC; Constriction, Pathologic; Female; Human; Male; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|TU; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Warfarin|TU

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY
ISSN
0039-2499
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 13 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.
Author
Baigent C; Collins R; Appleby P; Parish S; Sleight P; Peto R
Address
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE. ctsu.ox.ac.uk
Source
BMJ, 1998 May, 316:7141, 1337-43
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of intravenous streptokinase, one month of oral aspirin, or both, on long term survival after suspected acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Randomised, "2 x 2 factorial," placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 417 hospitals in 16 countries. SUBJECTS: 17 187 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between March 1985 and December 1987. Follow up of vital status complete to at least 1 January 1990 for 95% of all patients and to mid-1997 for the 6213 patients in United Kingdom. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous streptokinase (1.5 MU in 1 hour) and oral aspirin (162 mg daily for 1 month) versus matching placebos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality from all causes during up to 10 years' follow up, with subgroup analyses based on 4 year follow up. RESULTS: After randomisation, 1841 deaths were recorded in days 0-35, 991 from day 36 to end of year 1, 1478 in years 2-4, and 1230 in years 5-10. Allocation to streptokinase was associated with 29 (95% confidence interval 20 to 38) fewer deaths per 1000 patients during days 0-35. This early benefit persisted (death rate ratio 0.98 (0.92 to 1.04) for additional deaths between day 36 and end of year 10), so that there were 28 (14 to 42) and 23 (2 to 44) fewer deaths per 1000 patients treated with streptokinase after 4 years and 10 years respectively. There was no evidence that absolute survival benefit increased with prolonged follow up among any category of patient, including those presenting early after symptoms started or with anterior ST elevation. Nor did the early benefits seem to be lost in any category (including those aged over 70). Allocation to one month of aspirin was associated with 26 (16 to 35) fewer deaths per 1000 during first 35 days, with little further benefit or loss during subsequent years (death rate ratio 0.99 (0.93 to 1.06) between day 36 and end of year 10). The early benefit obtained with combination of streptokinase and one month of aspirin also seemed to persist long term. CONCLUSIONS: The early survival advantages produced by fibrinolytic therapy and one month of aspirin started in acute myocardial infarction seem to be maintained for at least 10 years.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98232444

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Fibrinolytic Agents|*AD; Myocardial Infarction|*DT; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*AD; Streptokinase|*AD
MeSH Heading
Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Age; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0959-8138
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 14 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Effects of prior aspirin and anti-ischemic therapy on outcome of patients with unstable angina. TIMI 7 Investigators. Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischemia.
Author
Borzak S; Cannon CP; Kraft PL; Douthat L; Becker RC; Palmeri ST; Henry T; Hochman JS; Fuchs J; Antman EM; McCabe C; Braunwald E
Address
Cardiovascular Division, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Source
Am J Cardiol, 1998 Mar, 81:6, 678-81
Abstract
Both aspirin and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs have been shown to reduce the risk of death or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with unstable angina, but their effect during chronic use on the presentation of acute coronary syndromes is less well defined. Calcium antagonists and oral nitrates are also widely prescribed for patients with coronary disease, but their effect on presentation of acute myocardial ischemia is unknown. We retrospectively examined the effects of prior aspirin and anti-ischemic medical therapy on clinical events in 410 patients hospitalized for unstable angina. Ischemic pain occurred at rest for a duration of 5 to 60 minutes. During hospitalization, 97% of patients received aspirin and all received the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin for at least 72 hours. Despite being older and more likely to have risk factors for coronary disease and poor outcome, patients receiving aspirin before admission were less likely to present with non-Q-wave AMI (5% vs 14% in patients not on aspirin, p = 0.004). Prior beta blocker, calcium antagonist, or nitrate administration did not appear to modify presentation as unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI. In a multivariate model, the combined incidence of death, AMI not present at enrollment, or recurrent angina was best predicted by age (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.38 [1.14 to 3.98]) and presence of electrocardiographic changes with pain on presentation (adjusted odds ratio 2.83 [1.50 to 5.35]) but was not related to prior or in-hospital medical therapy. Thus, aspirin but not anti-ischemic therapy before hospitalization of patients with unstable angina was associated with a decreased incidence of non-Q-wave AMI on admission.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98186302

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Angina, Unstable|*PC/PP; Aspirin|*TU; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU; Vasodilator Agents|*TU
MeSH Heading
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists|TU; Adult; Aged; Calcium Channel Blockers|TU; Electrocardiography|DE; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Nitroglycerin|TU; Odds Ratio; Retrospective Studies; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0002-9149
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 15 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Thrombosis prevention trial: randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. The Medical Research Council's General Practice Research Framework [see comments]
Address
Source
Lancet, 1998 Jan, 351:9098, 233-41
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate low intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). METHODS: 5499 men aged between 45 years and 69 years at high risk of IHD were recruited from 108 practices in the UK that belong to the Medical Research Council's General Practice Research Framework. Initially, warfarin or placebo was randomly allocated to 1427 men; 1013 of these men later moved to a factorial stage of the trial, retaining their warfarin or placebo warfarin allocation and adding randomly allocated active or placebo aspirin. Another 4072 men entered directly into the factorial stage making a total of 5085 men. The four factorial treatment groups were: active warfarin and active aspirin (WA, n = 1277), active warfarin and placebo aspirin (W, n = 1268), and placebo warfarin and active aspirin (A, n = 1268), and placebo warfarin and placebo aspirin (P, n = 1272). The primary end-point was all IHD defined as the sum of coronary death and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). FINDINGS: The mean International Normalised Ratio (INR) of those on active warfarin was 1.47. The mean warfarin dose was 4.1 mg a day (range 0.5 mg-12.5 mg). There were 410 IHD events (142 fatal, 268 non-fatal). The main effect of warfarin (i.e., WA and W vs A and P) was a reduction in all IHD of 21% (95% CI 4-35, p = 0.02) chiefly due to a 39% reduction (15-57, p = 0.003) in fatal events so that warfarin reduced the death rate from all causes by 17% (1-30, p = 0.04). The main effect of aspirin (i.e., WA and A vs W and P) was a reduction in all IHD of 20% (1-35, p = 0.04) almost entirely due to a 32% reduction (12-48, p = 0.004) in non-fatal events. Absolute reductions in all IHD due to warfarin or aspirin were 2.6 and 2.3 per 1000 person years, respectively. WA reduced all IHD by 34% (11-51, p = 0.006) compared with P. WA increased haemorrhagic and fatal strokes. Ruptured aortic or dissecting aneurysms occurred in 15 of those who were or had been on warfarin compared with three of those who had not (p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: These results add to evidence that aspirin reduces non-fatal IHD. Warfarin reduced all IHD chiefly because of an effect on fatal events. Combined treatment with warfarin and aspirin is more effective in the reduction of IHD than either agent on its own.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98118275

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|AD/AE/*TU; Aspirin|AD/AE/*TU; Myocardial Ischemia|MO/*PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AD/AE/*TU; Thrombosis|*PC; Warfarin|AD/AE/*TU
MeSH Heading
Administration, Oral; Aged; Cerebrovascular Disorders|CI/EP; Comparative Study; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Hemorrhage|CI; Human; Incidence; Male; Middle Age; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0140-6736
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 16 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Randomised double-blind trial of fixed low-dose warfarin with aspirin after myocardial infarction. Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS) Investigators [see comments]
Address
Source
Lancet, 1997 Aug, 350:9075, 389-96
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and systematic anticoagulation with warfarin reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction when given alone. In the Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS), we aimed to find out whether a combination of low-dose warfarin and low-dose aspirin would give superior results to standard aspirin monotherapy without excessive bleeding risk. METHODS: We used a randomised double-blind study design. At 293 sites, we randomly assigned 8803 patients who had had myocardial infarction, treatment with 160 mg aspirin, 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, or 1 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin. Patients took a single tablet daily, and attended for prothrombin time (PT) measurements at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12, and then every 3 months. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 33 months (median 14 months). FINDINGS: The primary event was first occurrence of reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. 1-year life-table estimates for the primary event were 8.6% (95% CI 7.6-9.6) for 160 mg aspirin, 8.4% (7.4-9.4) for 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, and 8.8% (7.6-10) for 1 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin. Primary comparisons were done with all follow-up data. The relative risk of the primary event for the 160 mg aspirin group compared with the 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin group was 0.95 (0.81-1.12, p = 0.57). For spontaneous major haemorrhage (not procedure related), 1-year life-table estimates were 0.74% (0.43-1.1) in the 160 mg aspirin group and 1.4% (0.94-1.8) in the 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin group (p = 0.014 log rank on follow-up). For the 3382 patients assigned 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, the INR results were: at week 1 (n = 2985) median 1.51 (IQR 1.23-2.13); at week 4 (n = 2701) 1.27 (1.13-1.64); at month 6 (n = 2145) 1.19 (1.08-1.44). INTERPRETATION: Low, fixed-dose warfarin (1 mg or 3 mg) combined with low-dose aspirin (80 mg) in patients who have had myocardial infarction does not provide clinical benefit beyond that achievable with 160 mg aspirin monotherapy.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97406189

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Myocardial Infarction|CO/*DT/PC; Warfarin|*AD
MeSH Heading
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases|MO; Diabetes Mellitus|CO; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Risk; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0140-6736
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 17 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Aspirin plus either dipyridamole or ticlopidine is effective in preventing recurrent myocardial infarction. Secondary Prevention Group.
Author
Ishikawa K; Kanamasa K; Hama J; Ogawa I; Takenaka T; Naito T; Yamamoto T; Nakai S; Oyaizu M; Kimura A; Yamamoto K; Katori R
Address
First Department of Internal Medicine, Kinki University, School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Source
Jpn Circ J, 1997 Jan, 61:1, 38-45
Abstract
The efficacy of combining antiplatelet agents with low doses of aspirin to prevent cardiac events in patients with myocardial infarction was examined. A total of 1,083 patients with prior myocardial infarction were randomly divided into those who were (618) and were not (465) treated with antiplatelet agents, and observed for 12.5 +/- 18.5 months. Those treated with antiplatelet agents included 113 patients treated with aspirin (50 mg) plus dipyridamole (150 mg/day), 253 treated with aspirin (50 mg) plus ticlopidine (200 mg/day), and 252 treated with only 1 of the 3 antiplatelet agents. Cardiac events, including fatal or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction, death by congestive heart failure, and sudden death, occurred in 34 patients (7.3%) in the nontreatment group and in 19 patients (3.1%; p < 0.01) in the treatment group; odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.71. There were only 2 cardiac events (1.8%) in the aspirin + dipyridamole group (p < 0.05 vs nontreatment group: odds ratio 0.28: 0.08-1.03), and 5 such events (2.0%) in the aspirin + ticlopidine group (p < 0.01; odds ratio 0.28: 0.11-0.69). Subgroup analysis to exclude differences in the patients' background confirmed the efficacy of these antiplatelet agents. We conclude that combined treatment with low doses of aspirin plus either dipyridamole or ticlopidine is effective in preventing cardiac events in patients who have had prior myocardial infarction.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97224524

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Dipyridamole|*AD; Myocardial Infarction|*PC/PP; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*AD; Ticlopidine|*AD
MeSH Heading
Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human; Male; Middle Age; Recurrence

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0047-1828
Country of Publication
JAPAN


Record 18 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10

Title
Use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering medications before recurrent acute myocardial infarction: missed opportunities for prevention?
Author
McCormick D; Gurwitz JH; Lessard D; Yarzebski J; Gore JM; Goldberg RJ
Address
Division of General Medicine/Primary Care/Geriatrics, Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.
Source
Arch Intern Med, 1999 Mar, 159:6, 561-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients who have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI), the use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering agents reduces the risk of recurrent MI and death. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in and determinants of receipt of these 3 medications before hospitalization for recurrent acute MI (AMI). METHODS: The study population consisted of 1710 patients with a previous history of MI hospitalized with a validated recurrent AMI in all hospitals in Worcester, Mass, during 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, and 1995. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of demographic, clinical, and temporal factors on the receipt of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering medications before hospital admission for recurrent AMI. RESULTS: More than 47% of patients in each study year were not receiving each medication before admission, although significant increases in use were noted over time for aspirin (from 13.5% to 52.6%), beta-blockers (from 33.2% to 44.4%), and lipid-lowering medications (from 0.8% to 11.7%). In multivariate analyses, advancing age was associated with not receiving aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.89), lipid-lowering medications (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.25), and beta-blockers (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00), although this effect was of borderline significance for beta-blockers. Being a woman was associated with not receiving aspirin (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98) but was positively associated with receiving lipid-lowering medications (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.04-2.43). Coexisting medical conditions and concurrent use of other cardiovascular medications were also associated with receipt of each medication. CONCLUSION: Despite encouraging increases over time, the low absolute levels of receipt of medications shown to be efficacious in the long-term treatment of patients after an MI, and their variation by age and sex, suggest that substantial opportunities may exist to prevent recurrent AMIs through the increased use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering medications.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99188498

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10


MeSH Heading (Major)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists|*TU; Antilipemic Agents|*TU; Aspirin|*TU; Fibrinolytic Agents|*TU; Myocardial Infarction|*PC
MeSH Heading
Aged; Female; Human; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Age; Odds Ratio; Patient Admission; Recurrence; Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0003-9926
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 19 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Results of the CAPRIE trial: efficacy and safety of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events.
Author
Creager MA
Address
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Source
Vasc Med, 1998, 3:3, 257-60
Abstract
The recent CAPRIE trial (clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events) compared clopidogrel with aspirin in reducing the risk of vascular events in 19,185 patients with clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis. Participants were randomized to receive daily oral clopidogrel (75 mg) or aspirin (325 mg). Treatment periods ranged from 1 to 3 years. The primary outcome measurement was an aggregate of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and vascular death. Event rates of 5.32% and 5.83% were associated with clopidogrel and aspirin therapy, respectively. Clopidogrel therapy resulted in a relative risk reduction of 8.7% (CI 0.3-16.5%) compared with aspirin therapy (p = 0.043). Gastrointestinal hemorrhages occurred in 1.99% of patients treated with clopidogrel and 2.66% of patients treated with aspirin (p < 0.002). There were no significant treatment-based differences in the rates of intracerebral hemorrhages and hemorrhagic deaths or thrombocytopenia. These results indicate that clopidogrel is more effective and safer than aspirin in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerosis.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99107538

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*TU; Atherosclerosis|*DT; Cerebrovascular Disorders|*/DT/PC; Myocardial Infarction|*/DT/PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU; Ticlopidine|*AA/TU
MeSH Heading
Comparative Study; Follow-Up Studies; Human; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; REVIEW, TUTORIAL
ISSN
1358-863X
Country of Publication
ENGLAND


Record 20 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Aspirin administration for cardiac-related acute chest pain/angina: increased use in Medicare patients.
Author
Bing M; Abel RL; Pendergrass P; Malone M; Sabharwal K; McCauley C
Address
Texas Medical Foundation, Austin 78746-5799, USA.
Source
South Med J, 1999 Jan, 92:1, 23-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD), the leading cause of death in the United States, accounted for approximately 490,000 deaths in 1993. Angina pectoris, a manifestation of CHD, accounted for 13,586 Medicare discharges in 1993 in Texas. A pilot project showed aspirin prophylaxis that reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in individuals with acute angina is underused. Texas Medical Foundation collaborated with 10 acute-care facilities to improve aspirin prophylaxis. METHODS: Collaborators assessed processes of care and implemented clinical pathways to improve aspirin administration. Data were abstracted from medical records before and after pathway implementation to evaluate impact. RESULTS: Aspirin administration during hospital stay increased 10.8%, aspirin administration on discharge increased 11.7%, and average time from arrival to aspirin administration decreased 2.9 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest collaborator-implemented clinical pathways significantly improved care received by Medicare patients admitted for cardiac-related acute chest pain/angina. Data suggest room for further improvement.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99129602

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Angina Pectoris|*DT; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal|*TU; Aspirin|*TU; Physician's Practice Patterns|*
MeSH Heading
Acute Disease; Aged; Critical Pathways; Female; Hospitalization; Human; Male; Medicare; Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Texas; United States

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY
ISSN
0038-4348
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES
CAS Registry/EC Number
0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal); 50-78-2 (Aspirin)


Record 21 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events.
Author
Augustovski FA; Cantor SB; Thach CT; Spann SJ
Address
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Unidad de Medicina Familiar y Preventiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Source
J Gen Intern Med, 1998 Dec, 13:12, 824-35
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The use of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in the general population is controversial. The purpose of this study was to create a versatile model to evaluate the effects of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with different risk profiles. DESIGN: A Markov decision-analytic model evaluated the expected length and quality of life for the cohort's next 10 years as measured by quality-adjusted survival for the options of taking or not taking aspirin. SETTING: Hypothetical model of patients in a primary care setting. PATIENTS: Several cohorts of patients with a range of risk profiles typically seen in a primary care setting were considered. Risk factors considered included gender, age, cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, diabetes, and presence of left ventricular hypertrophy. The cohorts were followed for 10 years. Outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, gastrointestinal bleed, ulcer, and death. MAIN RESULTS: For the cases considered, the effects of aspirin varied according to the cohort's risk profile. By taking aspirin, the lowest-risk cohort would be the most harmed with a loss of 1.8 quality-adjusted life days by taking aspirin; the highest risk cohort would achieve the most benefit with a gain of 11.3 quality-adjusted life days. Results without quality adjustment favored taking aspirin in all the cohorts, with a gain of 0.73 to 8.04 days. The decision was extremely sensitive to variations in the utility of taking aspirin and to aspirin's effects on cardiovascular mortality. The model was robust to other probability and utility changes within reasonable parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The decision of whether to take aspirin as primary prevention for cardiovascular events depends on patient risk. It is a harmful intervention for patients with no risk factors, and it is beneficial in moderate and high-risk patients. The benefits of aspirin in this population are comparable to those of other widely accepted preventive strategies. It is especially dependent on the patient's risk profile, patient preferences for the adverse effects of aspirin, and on the level of beneficial effects of aspirin on cardiovascular-related mortality.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99061869

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #10
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*TU; Cardiovascular Diseases|*PC; Decision Support Techniques|*; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU
MeSH Heading
Human; Quality of Life; Risk Assessment; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0884-8734
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES
CAS Registry/EC Number
0 (Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors); 50-78-2 (Aspirin)


Record 22 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke by aspirin: different mechanisms? Different dosage?
Author
Patrono C
Address
Department of Medicine and Aging, University of Chieti, G. D'Annunzio School of Medicine, Italy. cpatrono@unich.it
Source
Thromb Res, 1998 Sep, 92:1 Suppl 1, S7-12
Abstract
More than 50 randomized trials have documented the efficacy and safety of aspirin as an antiplatelet agent and a cardiovascular drug. However, the optimal dose for preventing coronary and cerebral thrombosis has long been a cause of debate. For patients with ischaemic heart disease the range recommended for the prevention of a secondary event, based on strong clinical evidence, is 75-160 mg aspirin/day. For patients with cerebrovascular disease, recommendations range from 30-1300 mg/day. If these patients require a higher dose of aspirin it suggests that a different mechanism of action is involved. This paper considers hypotheses and reports the findings of recent clinical trials. The SALT study compared aspirin with placebo in 1360 patients with TIA or minor ischaemic stroke. It showed an 18% reduction in the risk of stroke or death in patients receiving 75 mg aspirin/day. Five other trials of 55,000 patients with ischaemic cerebrovascular disease compared the protective effect of aspirin (range 30-300 mg/day) with placebo, clopidogrel, or oral anticoagulants. Aspirin was better than placebo, safer than oral anticoagulants, and no different from clopidogrel. The implications of these findings are discussed. Mechanistic studies and randomized clinical trials strongly suggest that the mechanism of action and dose requirement of the antithrombotic effect of aspirin in patients with cerebrovascular disease is the same as that for ischaemic heart disease.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98453091

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|AD/*PD; Cerebrovascular Disorders|DT/*PC; Fibrinolytic Agents|AD/*PD; Myocardial Infarction|*PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AD/*PD
MeSH Heading
Human; Myocardial Ischemia|DT; Randomized Controlled Trials

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW; REVIEW, TUTORIAL
ISSN
0049-3848
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 23 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Randomized evaluation of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation in high-risk patients: the multicenter aspirin and ticlopidine trial after intracoronary stenting (MATTIS).
Author
Urban P; Macaya C; Rupprecht HJ; Kiemeneij F; Emanuelsson H; Fontanelli A; Pieper M; Wesseling T; Sagnard L
Address
Department of Cardiology; La Tour Hospital, GenÄeve, Switzerland.
Source
Circulation, 1998 Nov, 98:20, 2126-32
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the association of ticlopidine and aspirin has been shown to be superior to anti-vitamin K agents and aspirin after coronary stent implantation in low-risk patients, the latter combination has remained an unproven reference regimen for high-risk patients until recently. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 350 high-risk patients within 6 hours after stent implantation to receive during 30 days either aspirin 250 mg and ticlopidine 500 mg/d (A+T group) or aspirin 250 mg/d and oral anticoagulation (A+OAC group) targeted at an international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3. The primary composite end point was defined as the occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or repeated revascularization at 30 days. Patients were eligible if (1) the stent(s) were implanted to treat abrupt closure after PTCA; (2) the angiographic result after implantation was suboptimal; (3) a long segment was stented (>45 mm and/or >/=3 stents); or (4) the largest balloon inflated in the stent had a nominal diameter of
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
99034566

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|*TU; Aspirin|AE/*TU; Coronary Thrombosis|*PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU; Stents|*AE; Ticlopidine|AE/*TU
MeSH Heading
Adult; Aged; Comparative Study; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Patient Compliance; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0009-7322
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 24 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study.
Author
Bertrand ME; Legrand V; Boland J; Fleck E; Bonnier J; Emmanuelson H; Vrolix M; Missault L; Chierchia S; Casaccia M; Niccoli L; Oto A; White C; Webb Peploe M; Van Belle E; McFadden EP
Address
Dept de Cardiologie B, HÈopital Cardiologique, 59037 Lille, France. bertrandme@aol.com
Source
Circulation, 1998 Oct, 98:16, 1597-603
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dual therapy with ticlopidine and aspirin has been shown to be as effective as or more effective than conventional anticoagulation in patients with an optimal result after implantation of intracoronary metallic stents. However, the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy alone in an unselected population has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomized to conventional anticoagulation or to treatment with antiplatelet therapy alone. Indications for stenting were classified as elective (decided before the procedure) or unplanned (to salvage failed angioplasty or to optimize the results of balloon angioplasty). After stenting, patients received aspirin and either ticlopidine or conventional anticoagulation (heparin or oral anticoagulant). The primary end point was the occurrence of bleeding or peripheral vascular complications; secondary end points were cardiac events (death, infarction, or stent occlusion) and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: In 13 centers, 236 patients were randomized to anticoagulation and 249 to antiplatelet therapy. Stenting was elective in 58% of patients and unplanned in 42%. Stent implantation was successfully achieved in 99% of patients. A primary end point occurred in 33 patients (13.5%) in the antiplatelet group and 48 patients (21%) in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio=0.6 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.98], P=0.03). Major cardiac-related events in electively stented patients were less common (odds ratio=0.23 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.91], P=0.01) in the antiplatelet group (3 of 123, 2.4%) than the anticoagulation group (11 of 111, 9.9%). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the antiplatelet group (4.3+/-3.6 versus 6. 4+/-3.7 days, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting significantly reduced rates of bleeding and subacute stent occlusion compared with conventional anticoagulation.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98451624

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|AE/*TU; Coronary Disease|CO/*TH; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AE/*TU; Stents|*; Surgical Procedures, Elective|*
MeSH Heading
Administration, Oral; Aged; Arterial Occlusive Diseases|PC; Aspirin|AE/TU; Comparative Study; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage|PC; Heparin|TU; Human; Male; Middle Age; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Ticlopidine|AE/TU; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0009-7322
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 25 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting. The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study.
Author
Bertrand ME; Legrand V; Boland J; Fleck E; Bonnier J; Emmanuelson H; Vrolix M; Missault L; Chierchia S; Casaccia M; Niccoli L; Oto A; White C; Webb Peploe M; Van Belle E; McFadden EP
Address
Dept de Cardiologie B, HÈopital Cardiologique, 59037 Lille, France. bertrandme@aol.com
Source
Circulation, 1998 Oct, 98:16, 1597-603
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dual therapy with ticlopidine and aspirin has been shown to be as effective as or more effective than conventional anticoagulation in patients with an optimal result after implantation of intracoronary metallic stents. However, the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy alone in an unselected population has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomized to conventional anticoagulation or to treatment with antiplatelet therapy alone. Indications for stenting were classified as elective (decided before the procedure) or unplanned (to salvage failed angioplasty or to optimize the results of balloon angioplasty). After stenting, patients received aspirin and either ticlopidine or conventional anticoagulation (heparin or oral anticoagulant). The primary end point was the occurrence of bleeding or peripheral vascular complications; secondary end points were cardiac events (death, infarction, or stent occlusion) and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: In 13 centers, 236 patients were randomized to anticoagulation and 249 to antiplatelet therapy. Stenting was elective in 58% of patients and unplanned in 42%. Stent implantation was successfully achieved in 99% of patients. A primary end point occurred in 33 patients (13.5%) in the antiplatelet group and 48 patients (21%) in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio=0.6 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.98], P=0.03). Major cardiac-related events in electively stented patients were less common (odds ratio=0.23 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.91], P=0.01) in the antiplatelet group (3 of 123, 2.4%) than the anticoagulation group (11 of 111, 9.9%). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the antiplatelet group (4.3+/-3.6 versus 6. 4+/-3.7 days, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting significantly reduced rates of bleeding and subacute stent occlusion compared with conventional anticoagulation.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98451624

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|AE/*TU; Coronary Disease|CO/*TH; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AE/*TU; Stents|*; Surgical Procedures, Elective|*
MeSH Heading
Administration, Oral; Aged; Arterial Occlusive Diseases|PC; Aspirin|AE/TU; Comparative Study; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage|PC; Heparin|TU; Human; Male; Middle Age; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Ticlopidine|AE/TU; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0009-7322
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 26 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Aspirin toxicity for human colonic tumor cells results from necrosis and is accompanied by cell cycle arrest.
Author
Subbegowda R; Frommel TO
Address
Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.
Source
Cancer Res, 1998 Jul, 58:13, 2772-6
Abstract
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer using aspirin has been demonstrated in rodents and has been suggested by data from epidemiological studies. The mechanism that accounts for this prevention is unknown, but it is thought to relate to an irreversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase and, subsequently, prostaglandin production. The effect of aspirin on the growth of human colonic tumor cells was determined in an effort to gain insight into a possible mechanism of action. In the two cell lines studied, SW 620 and HT-29, we observed a significant dose- and time-dependent increase in aspirin toxicity in a concentration range of 1.25-10 mM. This result was independent of prostaglandin production, because there was no measurable prostaglandin E2 in cell culture medium. As compared with controls, cells in cultures that contained aspirin were not detached, which suggests that the mechanism of cell death was not apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis revealed an increase in S phase and G2-M populations as well as the number of subdiploid nuclei in cultures treated with high-dose aspirin. Confirmation that cells were undergoing necrosis in response to aspirin was evident from the presence of cells that bound annexin V and accumulated propidium iodide in the absence of a population that bound annexin alone. The results suggest that aspirin induces cell cycle arrest and causes necrosis at high concentrations in vitro, but does not induce apoptosis. Collectively, these two events, necrosis and cell cycle arrest, may contribute to the chemopreventive effect that seems to result from long-term administration of aspirin in vivo.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98324267

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|AD/*PD; Colonic Neoplasms|ME/*PA/*PC; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors|AD/*PD
MeSH Heading
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic|PD; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle|DE; Cell Division|DE; Dinoprostone|AN; DNA, Neoplasm|DE; Flow Cytometry; Human; HT29 Cells|DE; Necrosis; Neoplasm Proteins|AN; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Vinblastine|PD

Publication Type
JOURNAL ARTICLE
ISSN
0008-5472
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 27 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20

Title
Low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units [see comments]
Author
Caritis S; Sibai B; Hauth J; Lindheimer MD; Klebanoff M; Thom E; VanDorsten P; Landon M; Paul R; Miodovnik M; Meis P; Thurnau G
Address
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Source
N Engl J Med, 1998 Mar, 338:11, 701-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether low-dose aspirin prevents preeclampsia is unclear. It is not recommended as prophylaxis in women at low risk for preeclampsia but may reduce the incidence of the disease in women at high risk. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in four groups of pregnant women at high risk for preeclampsia, including 471 women with pregestational insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, 774 women with chronic hypertension, 688 women with multifetal gestations, and 606 women who had had preeclampsia during a previous pregnancy. The women were enrolled between gestational weeks 13 and 26 and received either 60 mg of aspirin or placebo daily. RESULTS: Outcome data were obtained on all but 36 of the 2539 women who entered the study. The incidence of preeclampsia was similar in the 1254 women in the aspirin group and the 1249 women in the placebo group (aspirin, 18 percent; placebo, 20 percent; P=0.23). The incidences in the aspirin and placebo groups for each of the four high-risk categories were also similar: for women with pregestational diabetes mellitus, the incidence was 18 percent in the aspirin group and 22 percent in the placebo group (P=0.38); for women with chronic hypertension, 26 percent and 25 percent (P= 0.66); for those with multifetal gestations, 12 percent and 16 percent (P=0.10); and for those with preeclampsia during a previous pregnancy, 17 percent and 19 percent (P=0.47). In addition, the incidences of perinatal death, preterm birth, and infants small for gestational age were similar in the aspirin and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, low-dose aspirin did not reduce the incidence of preeclampsia significantly or improve perinatal outcomes in pregnant women at high risk for preeclampsia.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98145769

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20


MeSH Heading (Major)
Aspirin|*AD; Pre-Eclampsia|EP/*PC
MeSH Heading
Adult; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent|CO; Double-Blind Method; Female; Human; Hypertension|CO; Incidence; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetes|CO; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy, Multiple; Risk Factors; Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0028-4793
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 28 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30

Title
A randomized trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin. The Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) Study Group.
Address
Source
Ann Neurol, 1997 Dec, 42:6, 857-65
Abstract
Aspirin is only modestly effective in the secondary prevention after cerebral ischemia. Studies in other vascular disorders suggest that anticoagulant drugs in patients with cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial (noncardiac) origin might be more effective. The aim of the Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) therefore was to compare the efficacy and safety of 30 mg aspirin daily and oral anticoagulation (international normalized ratio [INR] 3.0-4.5). Patients referred to a neurologist in one of 58 collaborating centers because of a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke (Rankin grade < or =3) were eligible. Randomization was concealed, treatment assignment was open, and assessment of outcome events was masked. The primary measure of outcome was the composite event "death from all vascular causes, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal major bleeding complication." The trial was stopped at the first interim analysis. A total of 1,316 patients participated; their mean follow-up was 14 months. There was an excess of the primary outcome event in the anticoagulated group (81 of 651) versus 36 of 665 in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.5). This excess could be attributed to 53 major bleeding complications (27 intracranial; 17 fatal) during anticoagulant therapy versus 6 on aspirin (3 intracranial; 1 fatal). The bleeding incidence increased by a factor of 1.43 (95% CI, 0.96-2.13) for each 0.5 unit increase of the achieved INR. Anticoagulant therapy with an INR range of 3.0 to 4.5 in patients after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin is not safe. The efficacy of a lower intensity anticoagulation regimen remains to be determined.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98065735

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30


MeSH Heading (Major)
Anticoagulants|AE/*TU; Aspirin|AE/*TU; Cerebral Ischemia|*DT/*PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|AE/*TU
MeSH Heading
Aged; Female; Hemorrhage|CI; Human; Male; Middle Age; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Treatment Outcome

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0364-5134
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 29 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30

Title
A randomized trial of aspirin versus cilostazol therapy after successful coronary stent implantation.
Author
Kunishima T; Musha H; Eto F; Iwasaki T; Nagashima J; Masui Y; So T; Nakamura T; Oohama N; Murayama M
Address
Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Japan.
Source
Clin Ther, 1997 Sep, 19:5, 1058-66
Abstract
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used to treat patients with ischemic heart disease, but the procedure involves a number of problems, including acute coronary occlusion and restenosis. Although stents have proved useful for preventing post-PTCA restenosis, especially elastic recoil during the acute phase, no method has yet been established to prevent restenosis caused by vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in the late phase. Cilostazol selectively inhibits the 3'5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) III (cyclic guanosine monophosphate-inhibited PDE) of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate PDE family; it also has antithrombotic and vasodilating effects, as well as an inhibitory effect on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through PDE III inhibition. From November 1995 to March 1997, the usefulness of cilostazol versus aspirin in preventing subacute thrombosis and restenosis was studied in 70 patients (55 men and 15 women; 82 total lesions) who had undergone successful elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Patients were randomly allocated to receive aspirin 81 mg/d (40 patients with 45 lesions) or cilostazol 200 mg/d (30 patients with 37 lesions) alone. There was no difference in patients or angiographic characteristics between these groups. No subacute thrombosis, acute complications (ie, death, emergent coronary artery bypass grafting, or hemorrhagic complications), or drug side effects were found in the cilostazol group. The minimal lumen diameter (mean +/- SD) at follow-up was 1.89 +/- 1.08 mm in the aspirin group (41 lesions, 5.63 +/- 1.74 months after stent implantation) and 2.34 +/- 0.74 mm in the cilostazol group (35 lesions, 5.14 +/- 1.91 months after stent implantation), revealing statistically significant dilatation in the cilostazol group. The restenosis rate was 26.8% in the aspirin group, compared with 8.6% in the cilostazol group; this difference was statistically significant. Administration of cilostazol alone after the implantation of intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stents was useful for the prevention of subacute thrombosis and restenosis.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
98046603

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30


MeSH Heading (Major)
Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary|*MT; Aspirin|*TU; Coronary Disease|*PC; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors|*TU; Tetrazoles|*TU; Thrombosis|*PC
MeSH Heading
Comparative Study; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Recurrence|PC; Stents

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0149-2918
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Record 30 from database: MEDLINE
Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30

Title
Randomized, double-blind comparison of hirulog versus heparin in patients receiving streptokinase and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (HERO). Hirulog Early Reperfusion/Occlusion (HERO) Trial Investigators [see comments]
Author
White HD; Aylward PE; Frey MJ; Adgey AA; Nair R; Hillis WS; Shalev Y; Brown MA; French JK; Collins R; Maraganore J; Adelman B
Address
Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. white002@msn.com
Source
Circulation, 1997 Oct, 96:7, 2155-61
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy improves survival after myocardial infarction through reperfusion of the infarct-related artery. Thrombin generated during thrombolytic administration may reduce the efficacy of thrombolysis. A direct thrombin inhibitor may improve early patency rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation were given aspirin and streptokinase and randomized in a double-blind manner to receive up to 60 hours of either heparin (5000 U bolus followed by 1000 to 1200 U/h), low-dose hirulog (0.125 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 12 hours then 0.125 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)), or high-dose hirulog (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 12 hours then 0.25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). The primary outcome was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) grade 3 flow of the infarct-related artery at 90 to 120 minutes. TIMI 3 flow was 35% (95% CI, 28% to 44%) with heparin, 46% (95% CI, 38% to 55%) with low-dose hirulog, and 48% (95% CI, 40% to 57%) with high-dose hirulog (heparin versus hirulog, P=.023; heparin versus high-dose hirulog, P=.03). At 48 hours, reocclusion had occurred in 7% of heparin, 5% of low-dose hirulog, and 1% of high-dose hirulog patients (P=NS). By 35 days, death, cardiogenic shock, or reinfarction had occurred in 25 heparin (17.9%), 19 low-dose hirulog (14%), and 17 high-dose hirulog patients (12.5%) (P=NS). Two strokes occurred with heparin, none with low-dose hirulog, and two with high-dose hirulog. Major bleeding (40% from the groin site) occurred in 28% of heparin, 14% of low-dose hirulog, and 19% of high-dose hirulog patients (heparin versus low-dose hirulog, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hirulog was more effective than heparin in producing early patency in patients treated with aspirin and streptokinase without increasing the risk of major bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibition may improve clinical outcome.
Language of Publication
English
Unique Identifier
97477121

Return To Top
Return To Menu Position #20
Return To Menu Position #30


MeSH Heading (Major)
Antithrombins|AE/*TU; Aspirin|*TU; Heparin|AE/*TU; Hirudin|*AA/AE/TU; Myocardial Infarction|*DT; Peptide Fragments|AE/*TU; Streptokinase|*TU; Thrombolytic Therapy|*
MeSH Heading
Analysis of Variance; Comparative Study; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Catheterization; Human; Male; Middle Age; Recombinant Proteins|AE/TU; Recurrence; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Publication Type
CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ISSN
0009-7322
Country of Publication
UNITED STATES


Return To Top


 

 

Navigation Menu For The Book
Life Flow One
Home Page
Karl Loren's Book
Home Page Of The Data Section -- With Links To Each Separate Article Shopping Cart
To Purchase Oral Chelation Products
From Karl Loren
Home Page Of The Karl Loren Writings Section -- With Links To Each Separate Item Search The Entire Web Site
Using The Professional Google Search Engine Especially Indexed For This Web Site
Home Page Of The Oral Chelation Web Site
Section One
Who Will Die?
Section Two
The  Cholesterol Section
Section Three
What Causes Heart Disease?
Section Four
The Solution To Heart Disease
Section Five
The Water Section
Section Six
Ending Comments
Toxic Metals
And Their Effects In The Body
The Role Of Free Radicals
In Causing Disease
New Health Revelation
Ultimate Resource On Chelation Therapy